National Iodine Deficiency Disorders Control Programme

(NIDDCP)

 

 
 

 

 

 

 


Introduction:

Iodine  Deficiency Disorders (IDD) affect a large number  of population living in all the continents of our planet.There is an increasing evidence of wide-spread distribution of  environmental iodine  deficiency not only in the Himalayan region but  also  in Sub  Himalayan  terai areas, riverine area and even  the  coastal regions  .  The  survey conducted by the  Central  and  State Health  Directorates,  ICMR  and Medical  Colleges  have  clearly demonstrated  that  not even a single state/UT is free  from  the problem  of Iodine Deficiency Disorders . District level  IDD surveys have been conducted in 25 States and 4 Union  Territories of the country which revealed that out of 282 districts  surveyed so far IDD is a major public health problem in 242 districts.  In 1983-86,  a  survey conducted by ICMR in 14  districts   recorded goitre and cretinism rates of 21 and 0.7 percents,respectively

 

 

Objectives

Realizing  the  magnitude of the problem the  Government  of India  launched a 100 percent centrally assisted National  Goitre Control Programme (NGCP) in 1962 with the following objectives:

 

i)    Initial  surveys  to  assess the magnitude  of  the  Iodine Deficiency Disorders.

 

ii)   Supply of iodised salt in place of common salt.

 

iii)  Resurveys to assess the impact of iodised salt after  every   5 years.

 

In   August  1992, the National  Goitre  Control  Programme (NGCP)  was  renamed  as  National  Iodine  Deficiency  Disorders Control Programme (NIDDCP) with a view to emphasise wide spectrum disorders caused due to iodine deficiency.

 

 

Beneficiaries

All  people  residing in endemic and non endemic  areas  for IDD. The endemic area is given priority.

 

 

Activities and Services :

The following activities are  organised under the NIDDCP 

 

 

Production and Distribution of Iodised Salt

On the recommendations of Central Council of Health in 1984, the  Government decided to iodise the entire edible salt  in  the country  by  1992.  This policy decision was  implemented  w.e.f.  April,  1986 in a phased manner.The iodised salt  production  was  liberalizd to private sector. About 641 private manufactures were given licenses by Salt Commissioner out of which nearly 532 units have  commenced  production.  These  manufacturers  have   annual production  capacity  of iodised salt of more than 60  lakh  tons  (which is adequate for the entire country). The annual production of iodised salt has increased from 5 lakh metric tons in  1985-86 to  45 lakh metric tons in 1996-97.  This is expected to  further rise to 50 lakh metric tones in near future.

 

Funds  have been provided to Salt Commissioner's Office  for maintaining  the  quality  control of iodised  salt  produced  at production level.  The Salt Commissioner in consultation with the Ministry  of  the  Railways arranges for  the  transportation  of iodised salt from the production centres to the consuming  States on  a high priority (category 'B' a priority second to  that  for defence).

 

The Salt Commissioner has been initiating action to  install iodisation plant in the different states and to improve packaging of  iodated salt to prevent iodine loss during transit.The  State Government have been advised to include iodised salt under public Distribution System (PDS).

 

 

Notification for banning use of non-iodised salt

To ensure use of only iodised salt, the sale of non  iodised salt  has  been  completely  banned  under  Prevention  of   food Adulteration Act, 1954, in 22 States and 5 Union Territories  and partial  in  2 States .  There is no ban  notification  in  State  Kerala.The Central Council of Health in its meeting held in  1995 has  again  urged  the  remaining  State  Governments  to   issue notification  banning the sale of salt other than  iodised  salt.  Realising  the  importance of iodine deficiency  in  relation  to human resource development, NIDDCP has been included in 20  point pogramme of Prime Minister.

 

Establishment of Goitre Cell :

For effective monitoring and proper implementation of NIDDCP all the States and UTs have been advised to establish IDD control Cell  in the State Health Directorates. Presently 27  States  and Union Territories have been established IDD Cells.  The States of Goa,  Jammu  & Kashmir, Punjab, Union Territory  of  Pondicherry, Lakshwdeep  have  not  yet  set up such IDD  Control  Cells.  GOI provide  cash  grants for establishment and  functioning  of  the goitre cell (Table 4).

 

Information education and communication activities

 

The Central Government provide funds to states and UTs   for production of health education  material and carrying out  health education  activities  on  IDD as well  as  for  undertaking  IDD

surveys. To intensify the IEC activities a communication  package by  way of video films, posters/danglers and radio/TV spots  have been   produced.  TV  video  Spots  on  consequences  of   Iodine Deficiency  and the benefits of consuming iodised salt are  being regularly telecasted through the National Network of Doordarshan.

 

The  standards  for iodised salt have been laid  down  under PFA, act 1954.  This stipulate that the iodine content of salt at the production and consumption level should be at least 30 and 15 ppm respectively .

 

Intersectoral Co-ordination :

NIDDCP  activities  require integrated efforts  of  multiple agencies  like  Industry,  Railways, Health etc.   The  focus  of NIDDCP activities has now been shifted from  health department to

multi and interdisciplinary participation.

 

 

Laboratory Support:

A  National Reference Laboratory for monitoring of  IDD  has been  set up at the Bio-chemistry division of National  Institute of   Communicable  Diseases,  Delhi  for  training  medical   and paramedical  personnel and monitoring the iodine content of  salt and urine.

 

District  level IDD monitoring laboratories are  also  being setup  in  all  the  States  who  have  issued  ban  notification (complete/partial) for testing iodine content of salt and urinary iodine  excretion which are the most effective tools  for  proper implementation  of IDD Control Programme.  An allocation  of  Rs. 75,000  per laboratory has been provided. For the  year  1996-97, budget  provision  has  been  made for  setting  up  of  one  IDD Monitoring Laboratory in each State/UT.

 

For  ensuring  the  quality  control  of  iodated  salt   at consumption  level,  testing  kits for on  the  spot  qualitative testing  of  salt have been distributed to  all  District  Health Officers in states.

    

During  the  9th  Five plan, it is  proposed  to  strengthen Monitoring of NIDDCP to achieve the goal of universal  iodisation of  salt.  NIDDCP monitoring will be carried out at the  district level both by regular checking of iodised salt as well as urinary iodine excretion. It is also proposed to bring down the incidence of  IDD in all districts of the country below 10% level  by  2000 A.D.

 

 

Training  under NIDDCP Programmes :

Regular training Programmes in Management and Monitoring  of National  Iodine Deficiency Disorders Control Programme  for  the Regional  Directors of Health and Family Welfare as well  as  the State  level Technical Officers are being organised regularly  by the Directorate General of Health Services at New Delhi. Training Programmes  for laboratory Technicians from the State  level  IDD Monitoring   Laboratories  are  also  being  organised   by   the Directorate General of Health Services every year.

 

Monitoring and Reporting System:

A monitoring information system  has been developed in  many states  based on  a fixed number of salt samples  tested  by  the multipurpose workers. The MPWs use the spot testing kit for  this

purpose. In addition to monitoring the use of iodised salt,  this testing  kit has been proved to be an effective health  education  tool for promoting the consumption of iodised salt.

 

Iodised salt Vs Iodised oil in Prevention of IDD:

The inexpensive technology, a time honoured and time  tested one,  for the control of goitre is the iodation of  common  salt. Programmes for goitre control must rest squarely and socially  on

this  technology. Periodic parenteral administration  of  iodated oil  (not presently manufactured in India) has been suggested  as an  alternative  approach  especially in  areas  inaccessible  to common salt.  It is difficult to imagine any areas in South  Asia which are now inaccessible to common salt but readily  accessible to  disposable syringes and to an army of 'injectors'. There  has

been  a  steep  rise in the HIV seropositivity  rate  among  drug addicts  in India during the last few years. Those familiar  with real  life situations in the field will realise  that  disposable syringes   will  not  be  dutifully  disposed  off.   Under   the circumstancfes,  the  consequences of resorting to  a  technology which  is  dependent  on repeated  injections  (using  disposable syringes) could be disastrous.

 

Evaluation:

The  status  of  salt iodisation and  iodine  deficiency  in different  states  has  been extensively  assessed  by  different research  studies in recent years. The available data shows  that the  strategy  of  salt iodisation  has been  successful  in  the country in prevention and control of iodine deficiency disorders. More  than  70% of population was found consuming  iodised  salt. (Table 5,6,7,8,9).

 

     The  research  studies conducted  has  identified  following areas which require strengthening:-

 

  • A  low  priority  is accorded to the  NIDDCP  by  the  state  governments   leading to irregular distribution  of  iodised salt for varying periods

 

  • Lack of monitoring of quality of iodised salt distributed.

 

  • Failure  of  lifting of allotted quotas of iodised  salt  by  wholesale agents for further distribution to retailers.

 

  • Inadequate  coordination  between  salt  traders  and   food inspectors  (the implementors of PFA Act)causing  disruption in procurement, distribution and sale of  iodised salt.

 

  • Poor coordination between  various departments like food and civil supply, health, Industry, Railways.

 

  • No complete ban notification in the remaining States/UTs for the sale of non-iodated salt.

 

  • Non  Establishment  of  IDD Control  Cell  in  selected  all   States/UTs.

 

  • IDD  Monitoring Laboratories are yet to set up in  all  the States.

 

  • Inadequate   enforcement   of  PFA  act  by   the   State/UT Governments.   to  ensure  the quality of  iodised  salt  is  available to the consumer

 

  • Regular IDD surveys and resurveys are not conducted  by  the  State/UT Governments to monitor the progress or to  identify  new areas of endemicity.

 

 

TOP